Mission Statement

It is apparent to many of us that attempt to distinguish news from propaganda and political spin that our own Mainstream News Media is failing the American public and most of the time, publish what they want us to read rather than concentrating on investigative journalism and simply reporting the events occurring throughout the Global Community without deciding “what” is in their best corporate and/or political interests for the public to read. We believe that a free press is essential to maintaining and promoting true democracy. Our news media has failed the public miserably by “spinning” the news rather than reporting it without bias or self-censoring themselves in order to further the self-serving goals of corporate America. We will continue to engage in political commentary, however, when we do so, whenever possible, we will concentrate on providing links and quotes from other sources to substantiate our opinions  so that our commentary is based on fact and other reliable news sources rather than resorting to making wild accusations and opinion that has no basis in fact or reality that is the hallmark of  right-wing “talking heads.”

We actively engage in investigative journalism and will continue to report upon global events by constantly combing the Internet and using foreign as well as local sources and substantiated factual evidence that our own news media refuses to relay to the American public. We believe that it is essential that the American public remains an “informed public” and whether our media chooses to report upon issues that are frowned upon by the government or Corporate America, you are likely to find some of  those issues covered here to the best of our knowledge and ability. The Federal Court has ruled that Blogger’s can claim journalistic privileges if their content reflects that they are pursuing journalism rather than commentary based on nothing other than speculation and opinion. We believe that this is vital in covering local issues where releasing a confidential source could potentially harm to an individual or cause a person to lose his/her employment simply because they have decided to speak-out on an issue(s) and choose to remain anonymous, however, we will only exercise that right if we deem it necessary to report upon information that we have received from the public, and most of all, from reliable sources. If you have information on any issue that you believe the public should know about, please contact us at administrator@thepoliticalbandit.com, and we will reply as soon as possible, and if we decide to post information that we can verify, will take every measure possible to protect your identity.

Our site has been hacked several times over the past few months and working with our hosting company, have implemented tighter security and are able to restore the site almost immediately once we find out it’s down and back-up our data on a daily basis. To allow a greater diversity in our comment system, we are implementing the Disqus commenting system that will allow the readership to log-in through Facebook, Yahoo, Open ID, and several other methods. Comments will not be moderated unless they contain objectionable language, or in the alternative, are racially based or obvious “hate” related comments that we choose not to publish. If a comment appears to be unacceptable, please flag the comment and a moderator will examine it as soon as possible. We also choose not to publish comments that use extreme profanity unless an individual is quoting a public official that has chosen to drop-down to a level that should be made public to expose their vile and obscene language. (And even then, it’s easy to substitute some characters that vividly demonstrate what their language was without actually dropping-down to their level.) We also believe that it’s in the best interests of the general public to be informed of any instance where a public official  has issued racial epitaphs, attempt to incite violence, or otherwise express “hate speech” that is detrimental to the general public. We are extremely concerned with the current political climate where instead of meaningful dialogue, some people, including public figures, are advocating and/or alluding to threatening behavior and acts of vandalism that are creating an atmosphere of hate and fear that is often based on misconceptions and downright lies in order to further a political agenda that has the potential to lead the nation into chaos and anarchy.

We do believe in our right of assembly and free speech, and when it’s necessary, civil disobedience – however these acts which are usually defined as an “acceptable” means of expressing our discontent are general strikes, marches, sit-in’s, and other means of non-violent behavior that if organized on a massive scale, are historically extremely effective in making it known to Washington that society in general is protesting within our rights and have often been the “American Way” of achieving change when our government refuses to act in the best interests of the people. We soundly condemn acts of vandalism and violence and believe it’s counterproductive to achieving any meaningful “change that we can believe in.”

On the other hand, we do not delete or hide comments that are critical of our opinions or disagree with what we have posted; that’s simply free speech and while we hope to post articles that are in the best interests of our readership, we do respect other people’s opinions and their right to post those opinions whether we agree with them or not. On the other hand, bigoted comments and obscene language is not acceptable on this site, as we prefer to maintain a degree of civility and people whose personal ethics and morals that do not care to read obscenity are often turned-off by such comments and will refuse to return to any site that doesn’t maintain standards that even their children can read without being exposed to vulgarity and hate speech.

We are working on implementing an in-house email system where subscribers can contact one another and none of those internal messages will be read by, moderated, or even viewed by site administrator’s. (We are not sure if this feature will be available on the WordPress platform we are currently utilizing.) Our email system was also disabled several months ago and we are working to reinstall the necessary components that will allow someone to email adminsitrator@thepoliticalbandit.com and other important methods of contact. If you have attempted to contact us using normal means of attempting to contact someone with administrator privileges, we apologize that the system has been down for such a long period of time. We believe that it was essential to address extremely important security issues before revamping our email and messaging system, and this was to protect your privacy as well as our own.

We welcome any suggestions that would improve this site, and also urge writer’s to submit articles and Op-Eds that address issues that are currently being debated or of interest to the general public. Author’s with a proven track record of being reliable and are known for addressing the loss of our civil liberties and the shredding of our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the rule of law may receive posting privileges without being moderated by simply requesting said permission by sending an email to Administrator@thepoliticalbandit.com.

William Cormier, Site Administrator

Mitch Gurney, Site Administrator

Print Friendly
  • Anonymous

    All the driver’s of America, its time to unite. In unity there is tremendous strength. We are stronger than our government, Wall Street and the oil companies. We are being subjected to financial terrorism by our government (all parties included). Wall street, oil traders and the companies that outsource their employment needs to other parts of the world. What needs to be done is simple, don’t drive or deliver on July 4th weekend. Let’s start with a silent protest on Independence Day. Silence is golden. It is far better to sacrifice this weekend and send a message than to become sacrificial lambs of our government, Wall Street and all large oil companies and all the other large companies who give our jobs away. For if we do not take this action, we the willing, led by them the unknowing (our over-staffed/over-stuffed government) will now have to do the impossible with nothing.

  • Anonymous

    All the driver’s of America, its time to unite. In unity there is tremendous strength. We are stronger than our government, Wall Street and the oil companies. We are being subjected to financial terrorism by our government (all parties included). Wall street, oil traders and the companies that outsource their employment needs to other parts of the world. What needs to be done is simple, don’t drive or deliver on July 4th weekend. Let’s start with a silent protest on Independence Day. Silence is golden. It is far better to sacrifice this weekend and send a message than to become sacrificial lambs of our government, Wall Street and all large oil companies and all the other large companies who give our jobs away. For if we do not take this action, we the willing, led by them the unknowing (our over-staffed/over-stuffed government) will now have to do the impossible with nothing.

  • PETER JOHNSON

    I live in Australia and have been very worried about President Bushes intentions about Iran but, it seems to me that most current “leaders” of our modern society are all the same or are members of the same group that are out to screw everone for all they can get and don’t give a rat’s about how they do it or how many people they kill/hurt to do it. We in Australia are facing obscene price rises in everything, fuel is$1.72 a litre, bread $3.20 a loaf, taxes plus G.S.T. it goes on, we are hurting and they who we elected just don’t give a dam. The whole world should be very worried and start to do something about these people…I’m not sure what though but, to make something change you have to change something and we don’t have much time.

  • PETER JOHNSON

    I live in Australia and have been very worried about President Bushes intentions about Iran but, it seems to me that most current “leaders” of our modern society are all the same or are members of the same group that are out to screw everone for all they can get and don’t give a rat’s about how they do it or how many people they kill/hurt to do it. We in Australia are facing obscene price rises in everything, fuel is$1.72 a litre, bread $3.20 a loaf, taxes plus G.S.T. it goes on, we are hurting and they who we elected just don’t give a dam. The whole world should be very worried and start to do something about these people…I’m not sure what though but, to make something change you have to change something and we don’t have much time.

  • John Phillips

    Things are getting very scary. Check this out ” Israel pushing US to strike Iran”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/24/israel-pushing-us-to-stri_n_109043.html

  • John Phillips

    Things are getting very scary. Check this out ” Israel pushing US to strike Iran”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/24/israel-pushing-us-to-stri_n_109043.html

  • PETER JOHNSON

    Diesel (DIE-SEL) is now $1.89.9 ie. $1.90 per litre in Australia and it’s cheeper to make than petrol….something is definatly wrong, why do we put up with this obscene blatant rip off ?
    When the USA and Israel destroy the country of Iran(future new state of USA) I think horse prices are going to go sky high and they will have to rip up the highways so that it’s not so hard on the horses hooves. The USA and Arab states will have the monopoly until the Arabian states have the enevitable fall out with the USA and then the Arabs get NUKED as well and then boys and girls the good old US of A has all the world’s oil and the politician’s can charge what their little cold blooded hearts so desire.

  • PETER JOHNSON

    Diesel (DIE-SEL) is now $1.89.9 ie. $1.90 per litre in Australia and it’s cheeper to make than petrol….something is definatly wrong, why do we put up with this obscene blatant rip off ?
    When the USA and Israel destroy the country of Iran(future new state of USA) I think horse prices are going to go sky high and they will have to rip up the highways so that it’s not so hard on the horses hooves. The USA and Arab states will have the monopoly until the Arabian states have the enevitable fall out with the USA and then the Arabs get NUKED as well and then boys and girls the good old US of A has all the world’s oil and the politician’s can charge what their little cold blooded hearts so desire.

  • Heather Cumminski

    Home Page
    Latest News/Top Stories
    Most Popular Stories
    USA
    Canada
    Latin America & Caribbean
    Europe
    sub-Saharan Africa
    Russia and FSU
    Middle East
    Oceania
    Asia

    US War Agenda
    Global Economy
    Crimes against Humanity
    Environment
    Oil and Energy
    Militarization and WMD
    9/11 & ‘War on Terrorism’
    Police State
    Women’s Rights
    Biotechnology and GMO
    Law and Justice
    Media Disinformation
    Politics and Religion
    United Nations
    Science and Medicine
    Intelligence

    Archives
    Countries
    Author Index

    | Global Research RSS Feed

    America’s “War on Terrorism”

    by Michel
    Chossudovsky
    also available in pdf format

    ——————————————————————————–

    Seeds of
    Destruction

    by F.William Engdahl
    ——————————————————————————–

    The Globalization
    of Poverty

    by Michel
    Chossudovsky
    now available in pdf format

    ——————————————————————————–

    Celsius 911
    World Takeover
    & the War of Terror

    Produced by
    Jeremy Wright

    August 30, 2008 Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court

    Russia remains a Black Sea power

    by M K Bhadrakumar

    Global Research, August 29, 2008
    Asian Times

    Email this article to a friend
    Print this article

    If the struggle in the Caucasus was ever over oil and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) agenda towards Central Asia, the United States suffered a colossal setback this week. Kazakhstan, the Caspian energy powerhouse and a key Central Asian player, has decided to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Russia over the conflict with Georgia, and Russia’s de facto control over two major Black Sea ports has been consolidated.

    At a meeting in the Tajik capital Dushanbe on Thursday on the sidelines of the summit meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Kazakh President Nurusultan Nazarbayev told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that Moscow could count on Astana’s support in the present crisis.

    In his press conference in Dushanbe, Medvedev underlined that his SCO counterparts, including China, showed understanding of the Russian position. Moscow appears satisfied that the SCO summit also issued a statement on the Caucasus developments, which, inter alia, said, “The leaders of the SCO member states welcome the signing in Moscow of the six principles for regulating the South Ossetia conflict, and support Russia’s active role in assisting peace and cooperation in the region.” The SCO comprises China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

    There were tell-tale signs that something was afoot when the Kazakh Foreign Ministry issued a statement on August 19 hinting at broad understanding for the Russian position. The statement called for an “unbiased and balanced assessment” of events and pointed out that an “attempt [was made] to resolve a complicated ethno-territorial issue by the use of force”, which led to “grave consequences”. The statement said Astana supported the “way the Russian leadership proposed to resolve the issue” within the framework of the United Nations charter, the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and international law.

    The lengthy statement leaned toward the Russian position but offered a labored explanation for doing so.

    Kazakhstan has since stepped out into the thick of the diplomatic sweepstakes and whole-heartedly endorsed the Russian position. This has become a turning point for Russian diplomacy in the post-Soviet space. Nazarbayev said: I am amazed that the West simply ignored the fact that Georgian armed forces attacked the peaceful city of Tskhinvali [in South Ossetia]. Therefore, my assessment is as follows: I think that it originally started with this. And Russia’s response could either have been to keep silent or to protect their people and so on. I believe that all subsequent steps taken by Russia have been designed to stop bloodshed of ordinary residents of this long-suffering city. Of course, there are many refugees, many homeless.

    Guided by out bilateral agreement on friendship and cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia, we have provided humanitarian aid: 100 tons have already been sent. We will continue to provide assistance together with you.

    Of course, there was loss of life on the Georgian side – war is war. The resolution of the conflict with Georgia has now been shifted to some indeterminate time in the future. We have always had good relations with Georgia. Kazakhstan’s companies have made substantial investments there. Of course, those that have done this want stability there. The conditions of the plan that you and [President of France Nicolas] Sarkozy drew up must be implemented, but some have begun to disavow certain points in the plan.

    However, I think that negotiations will continue and that there will be peace – there is no other alternative. Therefore, Kazakhstan understands all the measures that have been taken, and Kazakhstan supports them. For our part, we will be ready to do everything to ensure that everyone returns to the negotiating table. From Moscow’s point of view, Nazarbayev’s words are worth their weight in gold. Kazakhstan is the richest energy producer in Central Asia and is a regional heavyweight. It borders China. The entire US regional strategy in Central Asia ultimately aims at replacing Russia and China as Kazakhstan’s number one partner. American oil majors began making a beeline to Kazakhstan immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 – including Chevron, with which US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was associated.

    Unsurprisingly, Kazakhstan figured as a favorite destination for US Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W Bush has lavishly hosted Nazarbayev in the White House.

    The US had gone the extra league in cultivating Nazarbayev, with the fervent hope that somehow Kazakhstan could be persuaded to commit its oil to the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, whose viability is otherwise in doubt. The pipeline is a crucial component of the US’s Caspian great game.

    The US had gone to great lengths to realize the pipeline project against seemingly hopeless odds. In fact, Washington stage-managed the “color” revolution in Georgia in November 2003 (which catapulted Mikheil Saakashvili to power in Tbilisi) on the eve of the commissioning of the pipeline. The general idea behind the commotion in the South Caucasus was that the US should take control of Georgia through which the pipeline passes.

    Besides, Kazakhstan shares a 7,500 kilometer border with Russia, which is the longest land border between any two countries in the world. It would be a nightmare for Russian security if NATO were to gain a foothold in Kazakhstan. Again, the US strategy had targeted Kazakhstan as the prize catch for NATO in Central Asia. The US aimed to make a pitch for Kazakhstan after getting Georgia inducted into NATO.

    These American dreams have suffered a setback with the Kazakh leadership now closing ranks with Moscow. It seems Moscow outwitted Washington.

    Belarus voices support The other neighboring country sharing a common border with Russia, Belarus, has also expressed support for Moscow. Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko visited Medvedev in Sochi on August 19 to express his solidarity.

    “Russia acted calmly, wisely and beautifully. This was a calm response. Peace has been established in the region – and it will last,” he commented.

    What is even more potent is that Russia and Belarus have decided to sign an agreement this autumn on creating a unified air defense system. This is hugely advantageous for Russia in the context of the recent US attempts to deploy missile defense elements in Poland and the Czech Republic.

    According to Russian media reports, Belarus has several S-300 air defense batteries – Russia’s advanced system – on combat duty and is currently negotiating the latest S-400 systems from Russia, which will be made available by 2010.

    Attention now shifts to the meeting of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), which is scheduled to take place in Moscow on September 5. The CSTO’s stance on the crisis in the Caucasus will be closely watched.

    It appears that Moscow and Kazakhstan are closely cooperating in setting the agenda of CSTO, whose members are Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The big question is how the CSTO gears up to meet NATO’s expansion plans. The emergent geopolitical reality is that with Russia’s recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Moscow has virtually checkmated the US strategy in the Black Sea region, defeating its plan to make the Black Sea an exclusive “NATO lake”. In turn, NATO’s expansion plans in the Caucasus have suffered a setback.

    Not many analysts have understood the full military import of the Russian moves in recognizing the breakaway Georgian republics.

    Russia has now gained de facto control over two major Black Sea ports – Sukhumi and Poti. Even if the US-supported regime of Viktor Yushchenko in Ukraine creates obstacles for the Russian fleet based in the Crimean port of Sevastopol – in all probability, Moscow will shrug off any Ukrainian pressure tactic – the fleet now has access to alternative ports on the Black Sea. Poti, in particular, has excellent facilities dating to the Soviet era.

    The swiftness with which Russia took control of Poti must have made the US livid with anger. Washington’s fury stems from the realization that its game plan to eventually eliminate Russia’s historical role as a “Black Sea power” has been rendered a pipe dream. Of course, without a Black Sea fleet, Russia would have ceased to be a naval power in the Mediterranean. In turn, Russia’s profile in the Middle East would have suffered. The Americans indeed had an ambitious game plan towards Russia.

    There is every indication that Moscow intends to assert the strategic presence of its Black Sea Fleet. Talks have begun with Syria for the expansion of a Russian naval maintenance base at the Syrian port of Tartus. The Middle East media recently suggested in the context of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to Moscow that Russia might contemplate shifting its Black Sea Fleet from Sevastopol to Syria. But this is an incorrect reading insofar as all that Russia needs is a supply and maintenance center for its warships, which operate missions in the Mediterranean. In fact, the Soviet navy’s 5th Mediterranean Squadron had made use of Tartus port for such purpose.

    China shows understanding Moscow will approach the CSTO summit pleased with the SCO’s backing, even it it was not without reservations. Medvedev said of the SCO meeting, Of course, I had to tell our partners what had actually happened, since the picture painted by some of the Western media unfortunately differed from real facts as to who was the aggressor, who started all this, and who should bear the political, moral and ultimately the legal responsibility for what happened …

    Our colleagues gratefully received this information and during a series of conversations we concluded that such events certainly do not strengthen the world order, and that the party that unleashed the aggression should be responsible for its consequences … I am very pleased to have been able to discuss this with our colleagues and to have received from them this kind of support for our efforts. We are confident that the position of the SCO member states will produce an appropriate resonance through the international security, and I hope this will give a serious signal to those who are trying to justify the aggression that was committed. It must have come as a relief to Moscow that China agreed to line up behind such a positive formulation. On Thursday, the Russian Foreign Ministry in Moscow also seems to have had its first contact with the Chinese Embassy regarding the issue. Significantly, the Foreign Ministry statement said the meeting between Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexei Borodavkin and Chinese ambassador Liu Guchang took place at the Chinese initiative.

    The statement claimed, “The Chinese side was informed of the political and legal motives behind Russia’s decision and expressed an understanding of them.” (Emphasis added.) It is highly unlikely that on such a sensitive issue, Moscow would have unilaterally staked a tall claim without some degree of prior tacit consent from the Chinese side, which is a usual diplomatic practice.

    The official Russian news agency report went a step further and highlighted that “China had expressed its understanding of Russia’s decision to recognize Georgia’s breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia”.

    The favorable stance by Belarus, Kazakhstan and China significantly boosts Moscow’s position. In real terms, the assurance that the three big countries that surround Russia will remain on friendly terms no matter the West’s threat to unleash a new cold war, makes a huge difference to Moscow’s capacity to maneuver. Any time now – possibly this weekend – we may expect Belarus to announce its recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

    Clearly, Moscow is disinterested to mount any diplomatic campaign to rally support from the world community for the sovereignty and independence of the two breakaway provinces. As a Moscow commentator put it, “Unlike in comrade Leonid Brezhnev’s time, Moscow is not trying to press any countries into supporting it on this issue. If it did, it could find quite a few sympathizers, but who cares?”

    It serves Moscow’s purpose as long as the world community draws an analogy between Kosovo and the two breakaway provinces. In any case, the two provinces have been totally dependent on Russia for economic sustenance.

    With the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, what matters critically for Moscow is that if the West now intends to erect any new Berlin Wall, such a wall will have to run zig-zag along the western coast of the Black Sea, while the Russian naval fleet will always stay put on the east coast and forever sail in and out of the Black Sea.

    The Montreal Convention assures the free passage of Russian warships through the Straits of Bosphorous. Under the circumstances, NATO’s grandiose schemes to occupy the Black Sea as its private lake seem outlandish now. There must be a lot of egg on the faces of the NATO brains in Brussels and their patrons in Washington and London.

    Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey.

    M K Bhadrakumar is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by M K Bhadrakumar

    ——————————————————————————–

    Please support Global Research
    Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.

    Your endorsement is greatly appreciated

    Subscribe to the Global Research E-Newsletter

    Spread the word! Forward to a friend!

    ——————————————————————————–

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

    To become a Member of Global Research

    The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

    http://www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

    For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

    © Copyright M K Bhadrakumar, Asian Times, 2008

    The url address of this article is: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9986

    ——————————————————————————–

    Privacy Policy

    © Copyright 2005-2008 GlobalResearch.ca
    Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2008

  • Heather Cumminski

    Home Page
    Latest News/Top Stories
    Most Popular Stories
    USA
    Canada
    Latin America & Caribbean
    Europe
    sub-Saharan Africa
    Russia and FSU
    Middle East
    Oceania
    Asia

    US War Agenda
    Global Economy
    Crimes against Humanity
    Environment
    Oil and Energy
    Militarization and WMD
    9/11 & ‘War on Terrorism’
    Police State
    Women’s Rights
    Biotechnology and GMO
    Law and Justice
    Media Disinformation
    Politics and Religion
    United Nations
    Science and Medicine
    Intelligence

    Archives
    Countries
    Author Index

    | Global Research RSS Feed

    America’s “War on Terrorism”

    by Michel
    Chossudovsky
    also available in pdf format

    ——————————————————————————–

    Seeds of
    Destruction

    by F.William Engdahl
    ——————————————————————————–

    The Globalization
    of Poverty

    by Michel
    Chossudovsky
    now available in pdf format

    ——————————————————————————–

    Celsius 911
    World Takeover
    & the War of Terror

    Produced by
    Jeremy Wright

    August 30, 2008 Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court

    Russia remains a Black Sea power

    by M K Bhadrakumar

    Global Research, August 29, 2008
    Asian Times

    Email this article to a friend
    Print this article

    If the struggle in the Caucasus was ever over oil and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) agenda towards Central Asia, the United States suffered a colossal setback this week. Kazakhstan, the Caspian energy powerhouse and a key Central Asian player, has decided to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Russia over the conflict with Georgia, and Russia’s de facto control over two major Black Sea ports has been consolidated.

    At a meeting in the Tajik capital Dushanbe on Thursday on the sidelines of the summit meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Kazakh President Nurusultan Nazarbayev told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that Moscow could count on Astana’s support in the present crisis.

    In his press conference in Dushanbe, Medvedev underlined that his SCO counterparts, including China, showed understanding of the Russian position. Moscow appears satisfied that the SCO summit also issued a statement on the Caucasus developments, which, inter alia, said, “The leaders of the SCO member states welcome the signing in Moscow of the six principles for regulating the South Ossetia conflict, and support Russia’s active role in assisting peace and cooperation in the region.” The SCO comprises China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

    There were tell-tale signs that something was afoot when the Kazakh Foreign Ministry issued a statement on August 19 hinting at broad understanding for the Russian position. The statement called for an “unbiased and balanced assessment” of events and pointed out that an “attempt [was made] to resolve a complicated ethno-territorial issue by the use of force”, which led to “grave consequences”. The statement said Astana supported the “way the Russian leadership proposed to resolve the issue” within the framework of the United Nations charter, the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and international law.

    The lengthy statement leaned toward the Russian position but offered a labored explanation for doing so.

    Kazakhstan has since stepped out into the thick of the diplomatic sweepstakes and whole-heartedly endorsed the Russian position. This has become a turning point for Russian diplomacy in the post-Soviet space. Nazarbayev said: I am amazed that the West simply ignored the fact that Georgian armed forces attacked the peaceful city of Tskhinvali [in South Ossetia]. Therefore, my assessment is as follows: I think that it originally started with this. And Russia’s response could either have been to keep silent or to protect their people and so on. I believe that all subsequent steps taken by Russia have been designed to stop bloodshed of ordinary residents of this long-suffering city. Of course, there are many refugees, many homeless.

    Guided by out bilateral agreement on friendship and cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia, we have provided humanitarian aid: 100 tons have already been sent. We will continue to provide assistance together with you.

    Of course, there was loss of life on the Georgian side – war is war. The resolution of the conflict with Georgia has now been shifted to some indeterminate time in the future. We have always had good relations with Georgia. Kazakhstan’s companies have made substantial investments there. Of course, those that have done this want stability there. The conditions of the plan that you and [President of France Nicolas] Sarkozy drew up must be implemented, but some have begun to disavow certain points in the plan.

    However, I think that negotiations will continue and that there will be peace – there is no other alternative. Therefore, Kazakhstan understands all the measures that have been taken, and Kazakhstan supports them. For our part, we will be ready to do everything to ensure that everyone returns to the negotiating table. From Moscow’s point of view, Nazarbayev’s words are worth their weight in gold. Kazakhstan is the richest energy producer in Central Asia and is a regional heavyweight. It borders China. The entire US regional strategy in Central Asia ultimately aims at replacing Russia and China as Kazakhstan’s number one partner. American oil majors began making a beeline to Kazakhstan immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 – including Chevron, with which US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was associated.

    Unsurprisingly, Kazakhstan figured as a favorite destination for US Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W Bush has lavishly hosted Nazarbayev in the White House.

    The US had gone the extra league in cultivating Nazarbayev, with the fervent hope that somehow Kazakhstan could be persuaded to commit its oil to the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, whose viability is otherwise in doubt. The pipeline is a crucial component of the US’s Caspian great game.

    The US had gone to great lengths to realize the pipeline project against seemingly hopeless odds. In fact, Washington stage-managed the “color” revolution in Georgia in November 2003 (which catapulted Mikheil Saakashvili to power in Tbilisi) on the eve of the commissioning of the pipeline. The general idea behind the commotion in the South Caucasus was that the US should take control of Georgia through which the pipeline passes.

    Besides, Kazakhstan shares a 7,500 kilometer border with Russia, which is the longest land border between any two countries in the world. It would be a nightmare for Russian security if NATO were to gain a foothold in Kazakhstan. Again, the US strategy had targeted Kazakhstan as the prize catch for NATO in Central Asia. The US aimed to make a pitch for Kazakhstan after getting Georgia inducted into NATO.

    These American dreams have suffered a setback with the Kazakh leadership now closing ranks with Moscow. It seems Moscow outwitted Washington.

    Belarus voices support The other neighboring country sharing a common border with Russia, Belarus, has also expressed support for Moscow. Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko visited Medvedev in Sochi on August 19 to express his solidarity.

    “Russia acted calmly, wisely and beautifully. This was a calm response. Peace has been established in the region – and it will last,” he commented.

    What is even more potent is that Russia and Belarus have decided to sign an agreement this autumn on creating a unified air defense system. This is hugely advantageous for Russia in the context of the recent US attempts to deploy missile defense elements in Poland and the Czech Republic.

    According to Russian media reports, Belarus has several S-300 air defense batteries – Russia’s advanced system – on combat duty and is currently negotiating the latest S-400 systems from Russia, which will be made available by 2010.

    Attention now shifts to the meeting of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), which is scheduled to take place in Moscow on September 5. The CSTO’s stance on the crisis in the Caucasus will be closely watched.

    It appears that Moscow and Kazakhstan are closely cooperating in setting the agenda of CSTO, whose members are Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The big question is how the CSTO gears up to meet NATO’s expansion plans. The emergent geopolitical reality is that with Russia’s recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Moscow has virtually checkmated the US strategy in the Black Sea region, defeating its plan to make the Black Sea an exclusive “NATO lake”. In turn, NATO’s expansion plans in the Caucasus have suffered a setback.

    Not many analysts have understood the full military import of the Russian moves in recognizing the breakaway Georgian republics.

    Russia has now gained de facto control over two major Black Sea ports – Sukhumi and Poti. Even if the US-supported regime of Viktor Yushchenko in Ukraine creates obstacles for the Russian fleet based in the Crimean port of Sevastopol – in all probability, Moscow will shrug off any Ukrainian pressure tactic – the fleet now has access to alternative ports on the Black Sea. Poti, in particular, has excellent facilities dating to the Soviet era.

    The swiftness with which Russia took control of Poti must have made the US livid with anger. Washington’s fury stems from the realization that its game plan to eventually eliminate Russia’s historical role as a “Black Sea power” has been rendered a pipe dream. Of course, without a Black Sea fleet, Russia would have ceased to be a naval power in the Mediterranean. In turn, Russia’s profile in the Middle East would have suffered. The Americans indeed had an ambitious game plan towards Russia.

    There is every indication that Moscow intends to assert the strategic presence of its Black Sea Fleet. Talks have begun with Syria for the expansion of a Russian naval maintenance base at the Syrian port of Tartus. The Middle East media recently suggested in the context of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to Moscow that Russia might contemplate shifting its Black Sea Fleet from Sevastopol to Syria. But this is an incorrect reading insofar as all that Russia needs is a supply and maintenance center for its warships, which operate missions in the Mediterranean. In fact, the Soviet navy’s 5th Mediterranean Squadron had made use of Tartus port for such purpose.

    China shows understanding Moscow will approach the CSTO summit pleased with the SCO’s backing, even it it was not without reservations. Medvedev said of the SCO meeting, Of course, I had to tell our partners what had actually happened, since the picture painted by some of the Western media unfortunately differed from real facts as to who was the aggressor, who started all this, and who should bear the political, moral and ultimately the legal responsibility for what happened …

    Our colleagues gratefully received this information and during a series of conversations we concluded that such events certainly do not strengthen the world order, and that the party that unleashed the aggression should be responsible for its consequences … I am very pleased to have been able to discuss this with our colleagues and to have received from them this kind of support for our efforts. We are confident that the position of the SCO member states will produce an appropriate resonance through the international security, and I hope this will give a serious signal to those who are trying to justify the aggression that was committed. It must have come as a relief to Moscow that China agreed to line up behind such a positive formulation. On Thursday, the Russian Foreign Ministry in Moscow also seems to have had its first contact with the Chinese Embassy regarding the issue. Significantly, the Foreign Ministry statement said the meeting between Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexei Borodavkin and Chinese ambassador Liu Guchang took place at the Chinese initiative.

    The statement claimed, “The Chinese side was informed of the political and legal motives behind Russia’s decision and expressed an understanding of them.” (Emphasis added.) It is highly unlikely that on such a sensitive issue, Moscow would have unilaterally staked a tall claim without some degree of prior tacit consent from the Chinese side, which is a usual diplomatic practice.

    The official Russian news agency report went a step further and highlighted that “China had expressed its understanding of Russia’s decision to recognize Georgia’s breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia”.

    The favorable stance by Belarus, Kazakhstan and China significantly boosts Moscow’s position. In real terms, the assurance that the three big countries that surround Russia will remain on friendly terms no matter the West’s threat to unleash a new cold war, makes a huge difference to Moscow’s capacity to maneuver. Any time now – possibly this weekend – we may expect Belarus to announce its recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

    Clearly, Moscow is disinterested to mount any diplomatic campaign to rally support from the world community for the sovereignty and independence of the two breakaway provinces. As a Moscow commentator put it, “Unlike in comrade Leonid Brezhnev’s time, Moscow is not trying to press any countries into supporting it on this issue. If it did, it could find quite a few sympathizers, but who cares?”

    It serves Moscow’s purpose as long as the world community draws an analogy between Kosovo and the two breakaway provinces. In any case, the two provinces have been totally dependent on Russia for economic sustenance.

    With the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, what matters critically for Moscow is that if the West now intends to erect any new Berlin Wall, such a wall will have to run zig-zag along the western coast of the Black Sea, while the Russian naval fleet will always stay put on the east coast and forever sail in and out of the Black Sea.

    The Montreal Convention assures the free passage of Russian warships through the Straits of Bosphorous. Under the circumstances, NATO’s grandiose schemes to occupy the Black Sea as its private lake seem outlandish now. There must be a lot of egg on the faces of the NATO brains in Brussels and their patrons in Washington and London.

    Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey.

    M K Bhadrakumar is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by M K Bhadrakumar

    ——————————————————————————–

    Please support Global Research
    Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.

    Your endorsement is greatly appreciated

    Subscribe to the Global Research E-Newsletter

    Spread the word! Forward to a friend!

    ——————————————————————————–

    Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

    To become a Member of Global Research

    The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

    http://www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

    For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

    © Copyright M K Bhadrakumar, Asian Times, 2008

    The url address of this article is: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9986

    ——————————————————————————–

    Privacy Policy

    © Copyright 2005-2008 GlobalResearch.ca
    Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2008

  • JANNETT

    From The TimesSeptember 27, 2008

    Seems latin American’s panic more than anyone else in the world.

    Cutnpasted this doc…That would send US interest rates through the roof and produce a “Latin American”-style run on the dollar. President Bush statement

    Anger, fear and deadlock, then President Bush sums it up: ‘This sucker could go down’
    It was supposed to be the meeting that solved everything, but even the Treasury Secretary on bended knee couldn’t clinch the dealGerard Baker in Washington
    The Cabinet Room in the White House has been the scene of some tense moments since it was rebuilt during the renovation of the West Wing by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1934, in the midst of the Great Depression.

    John Kennedy spent long hours there during the Cuban missile crisis as the world seemed to be hurtling towards nuclear war. President Bush convened his first Cabinet meeting in the white-stuccoed room after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, beneath the sombre gaze of busts of Jefferson and Franklin.

    But not since the days of FDR himself has there been such a high-stakes gathering with so many potentially far-reaching implications for the tottering global economy as the remarkable and contentious meeting that unfolded there on Thursday afternoon.

    It was supposed to be not much more than a photo-opportunity, a demonstration of national unity in the face of economic crisis. There, for the first time in anyone’s memory, the incumbent President was meeting the two candidates battling to succeed him, together with the entire leadership of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The aim was to conclude the week-long deliberations over the plan announced by Hank Paulson, the Treasury Secretary, for a $700 billion bailout of the nation’s banks and to get legislation through Congress by the weekend.

    Related Links
    US banking crisis: Q&A
    McCain falters as bailout swamps US election
    McCain backs down to attend debate
    When the photographers had been dismissed, President Bush spelt out what was at stake. According to senior advisers briefed on the detail of the meeting, he told the assembled leaders that it was not just the US financial system that was in peril. He made it clear that the entire architecture of the global economy was at stake.

    The US’s financial credibility was in jeopardy. If a deal were not concluded to back the bailout, there was a chance that global investors, including central banks around the world, would lose faith and begin selling their huge holdings of US government debt. That would send US interest rates through the roof and produce a Latin American-style run on the dollar.

  • JANNETT

    From The TimesSeptember 27, 2008

    Seems latin American’s panic more than anyone else in the world.

    Cutnpasted this doc…That would send US interest rates through the roof and produce a “Latin American”-style run on the dollar. President Bush statement

    Anger, fear and deadlock, then President Bush sums it up: ‘This sucker could go down’
    It was supposed to be the meeting that solved everything, but even the Treasury Secretary on bended knee couldn’t clinch the dealGerard Baker in Washington
    The Cabinet Room in the White House has been the scene of some tense moments since it was rebuilt during the renovation of the West Wing by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1934, in the midst of the Great Depression.

    John Kennedy spent long hours there during the Cuban missile crisis as the world seemed to be hurtling towards nuclear war. President Bush convened his first Cabinet meeting in the white-stuccoed room after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, beneath the sombre gaze of busts of Jefferson and Franklin.

    But not since the days of FDR himself has there been such a high-stakes gathering with so many potentially far-reaching implications for the tottering global economy as the remarkable and contentious meeting that unfolded there on Thursday afternoon.

    It was supposed to be not much more than a photo-opportunity, a demonstration of national unity in the face of economic crisis. There, for the first time in anyone’s memory, the incumbent President was meeting the two candidates battling to succeed him, together with the entire leadership of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The aim was to conclude the week-long deliberations over the plan announced by Hank Paulson, the Treasury Secretary, for a $700 billion bailout of the nation’s banks and to get legislation through Congress by the weekend.

    Related Links
    US banking crisis: Q&A
    McCain falters as bailout swamps US election
    McCain backs down to attend debate
    When the photographers had been dismissed, President Bush spelt out what was at stake. According to senior advisers briefed on the detail of the meeting, he told the assembled leaders that it was not just the US financial system that was in peril. He made it clear that the entire architecture of the global economy was at stake.

    The US’s financial credibility was in jeopardy. If a deal were not concluded to back the bailout, there was a chance that global investors, including central banks around the world, would lose faith and begin selling their huge holdings of US government debt. That would send US interest rates through the roof and produce a Latin American-style run on the dollar.

  • glen

    I live in the uk and i can see this sort of thing happening here too,but I also see people starting to wake up,people I would never expect to talk about things like this. Just hope the rest wake up a bit quicker. POWER TO THE PEOPLE.

  • glen

    I live in the uk and i can see this sort of thing happening here too,but I also see people starting to wake up,people I would never expect to talk about things like this. Just hope the rest wake up a bit quicker. POWER TO THE PEOPLE.

  • Vsbbvsvj

    Thanks!,

  • http://link Vsbbvsvj

    Thanks!,

  • http://www.squidoo.com/bejeweledcheatonfacebook Rousybrus

    hey im new to the forum. Cheat bejeweled blitz on facebook, with a step by step tutorial check out the link
    hope its usefull

    bejeweled cheat

  • http://www.squidoo.com/bejeweledcheatonfacebook Rousybrus

    hey im new to the forum. Cheat bejeweled blitz on facebook, with a step by step tutorial check out the link
    hope its usefull

    bejeweled cheat

  • http://iexdtphmoobo.com/ mtsysd

    EPGwWe rtfcenjlakck, [url=http://ncktbfuzyiwj.com/]ncktbfuzyiwj[/url], [link=http://vzfcbfesfyts.com/]vzfcbfesfyts[/link], http://igtqkjbrfmsu.com/

  • http://iexdtphmoobo.com/ mtsysd

    EPGwWe rtfcenjlakck, [url=http://ncktbfuzyiwj.com/]ncktbfuzyiwj[/url], [link=http://vzfcbfesfyts.com/]vzfcbfesfyts[/link], http://igtqkjbrfmsu.com/

  • http://bejeweledfacebookhack.blogspot.com/ seflalgeoxise

    get it from the site below
    bejeweled cheat

    greetz

  • http://bejeweledfacebookhack.blogspot.com seflalgeoxise

    get it from the site below
    bejeweled cheat

    greetz

  • http://verifiedfile.com/ Bresseweedpax

    http://tonytrainor.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dec-haiti-earthquake-appeal.jpg

    The country of Haiti is in turmoil. We can all help. Common folk & corporations worldwide are helping to extending financial assistance.

    According to Matthew Fleeger, an oil executive who donated over 7 million USD to the relief mission, “whatever bad situation you may have ever endured, it’s nothing compared to the death, disease and damage in Haiti”.

    Donate Directly via Google
    http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/

  • http://verifiedfile.com Bresseweedpax

    http://tonytrainor.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dec-haiti-earthquake-appeal.jpg

    The country of Haiti is in turmoil. We can all help. Common folk & corporations worldwide are helping to extending financial assistance.

    According to Matthew Fleeger, an oil executive who donated over 7 million USD to the relief mission, “whatever bad situation you may have ever endured, it’s nothing compared to the death, disease and damage in Haiti”.

    Donate Directly via Google
    http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/

  • Ragpreart

    A guy apparently opened fire on middle school students with a rifle. The math teacher, David Benke, stopped him and probably saved dozens of childrens’ lives at the risk of his own life. This man is a true hero.

    You can read the news article here http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_colo_school_shooting – Teacher tackles gunman suspected in school shooting
    We should all take a moment of silence for this man.

    Thank you.

  • Ragpreart

    A guy apparently opened fire on middle school students with a rifle. The math teacher, David Benke, stopped him and probably saved dozens of childrens’ lives at the risk of his own life. This man is a true hero.

    You can read the news article here http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_colo_school_shooting – Teacher tackles gunman suspected in school shooting
    We should all take a moment of silence for this man.

    Thank you.