3982944960_fbd0eaf915

The Government Believes You Might Be A Domestic Terrorist If….


This will begin to sound like a Jeff Foxworthy parody of “You might be  Redneck if…” – but unfortunately, based on our reading of a recent Activist Post, all of the above appears to be true and represents the inexorable trend that the United States is taking toward a Fascist/Authoritarian style of governance:

You might be a Domestic Terrorist if:

1.  Tea Party Activists: The political Left demonized peaceful Tea Party activists as right-wing extremists, leading to the second most powerful official in the U.S. government, VP Joe Biden, to liken them to terrorists.   Do you sympathize with those who are angry about bank bailouts on the backs of taxpayers? Well, you’re likely a terrorist in the eyes of the State.

On this site, we have accused Tea Party Radicals and the GOP of engaging in Economic terrorism, however, to “sympathize with those who are angry about bank bailouts on the backs of taxpayers” is disingenuous at best, and pure propaganda at worst.

2.  Occupy Activists: Now, the “Occupy” movement, said to be made up of left-wing extremists, is enjoying the same treatment as the Tea Party’s right-wing extremists.  The United Kingdom has officially labeled “Occupy” demonstrators as domestic terrorists. The U.S. hasn’t gone quite that far, but the violent Police State did spy on them in search of “domestic terrorists.” Watch out, you may be a terror suspect if you sympathize with the 99%.

The Occupy Wall Street Protestors are far from being “Domestic Terrorists;” the nation at large should be able to ascertain by the peaceful nature of the protests and their refusal to engage in violent protests that these protesters are nothing more than disgruntled Americans that are exercising their rights to Free Speech and Assembly – a constitutional right that has been recognized since the birth of our democracy. In fascist governments,  attempting to expose corruption and demanding “truth and accountability” from the government is often associated with Domestic Terrorism.

3.  7 Days of Food: The Department of Justice and FBI considers you a terrorist threat if you have more than 7 days of food stored, as explained by Rand Paul on the Senate floor:

Paul was referring to an official FBI/DOJ flyer given out to business owners to help them identify potential threats. And recently, Federal agents went to food storage facilities demanding customers lists, while citizens were harassed by the government with door-to-door “assessments” of their preparedness.

Americans are now understanding that Natural Disasters can strike without warning, as could Martial Law, either of which could severely disrupt the ability of our population to purchase food, medicine and other essentials. To categorize individuals that are attempting to protect their families from starvation and a disruption in our food supply is spurious at best and indicates that authorities are attempting to discover “who” is preparing their families for disaster, possibly to confidcate their food supplies in a National Emergency.

Furthermore, “It is part of Mormon Church religious doctrine to store food for hard times and emergencies, with a recommendation that each family store a year’s worth of basic dry goods along with three months worth of store-bought canned and boxed foods. To facilitate that practice, the Mormon Church runs its own food storage canneries selling powdered milk, wheat, flour, rice and beans, sugar, salt, and various other dry goods either in bulk 50 lb bags or in #10 cans for long term food storage (up to 30 years for some items). These Church canneries also often sell food storage items to non-church members, seeing it as both morally right and prudent to help their neighbors store food, whatever their faith. The cannery in Tennessee that was “visited” by federal agents follows that practice of helping the general public become better prepared.

4.  Missing Fingers: The document referred to by Rand Paul above, also claims that if someone is missing a finger or has burn marks, they’re more likely to be a terror suspect.
Has anyone ever noticed that Carpenters and other factory workers have lost fingers due to their professions and work-related accidents? How about people that received burns through common household or industrial accidents? This belief by Rand Paul is absurd and based on his own fear and loathing of our Constitutional beliefs – and his ploy to reduce the bulk of the population to receive a designation as Domestic Terrorists.
5.  Buying Flashlights:  Also from the same official source, if you’re buying night-vision devices including flashlights, you should be considered a terror suspect.
We will hazard a guess that the bulk of American homes contain one or more flashlights to use in the event of a power outage or to use where no light is available. Also, is it illegal to purchase night-vision devices, and if it is, when was such a draconian law enacted?

6.  Paying Cash at Hotels: Watch out if you want to pay with cash for hotel rooms.  This DHS commercial indicates that you’re a terror suspect if you do:

The DHS has also launched their citizen spy program for hotels and has sent them hotel protection guidelines which lists suspicious activities like persons carrying observation equipment or standing around in the same area.

This entry is absolutely hilarious; people everywhere that are engaging in adulterous affairs often pay cash at Hotels so their spouses cannot look through their credit card receipts and ascertain they are having an illicit affair with another individual. “Standing in one place” is often associated with either party waiting on the other and is another attempt at the government for inventing reasons to delve into our personal lives. Also, since when did it become “suspicious” to use cash instead of a credit card?

7.  Texting Privately in a Public Place: According to this DHS commercial for their citizen spy program, if you’re texting while sitting in a public park, but trying to keep it concealed from people who pass by, you should be reported for suspicious terrorist activity:

And what if you’re sending a message to an individual, girlfriend/boyfriend, spouse or even to your place of employment that you do not wish others to see? This is now “suspicious activity” that needs to be reported to DHS? When will the Police State quit attempting to track every movement that our general public engages in?

8.  Ron Paul Stickers: A 2009 law enforcement report from the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAClabeled Ron Paul supporters, Libertarians, and people sharing movies about the Federal Reserve as “domestic terrorists.” When supporters of a political candidate who stands for peace and freedom become terror suspects, America is in big trouble.

This assault on Ron Paul supporters reeks of election rigging and would seem to be designed to scare-off those whom are supporting Ron Raul for President – another egregious assault on our federally protected (Sic) Civil Rights. This also smacks of attempting to marginalize Ron Paul supporters.

9.  Belief in Conspiracies — Obama’s Information Czar, Cass Sunstein, has identified those who hold conspiracy theories as targets for online “cognitive infiltration.”  Do you question the motives for war?  Question the motives of the private Federal Reserve bank?  Question any government policies? Chances are you already have been marked as a suspect.

A Belief in “Conspiracy Theories?” Please, have we forgotten the Gulf of Tonkin Incident or the Iran-Contra Scandal, among other Conspiracy Theories that eventually were proven to be true and correct? Conspiracy theories are often the basis for investigating and exposing government subterfuge and malfeasance.

10.  Own Precious Metals – Despite the fact that the Federal Reserve paper note (a.k.a. the dollar) is only sustained by faith, you could now be a suspected terrorist if you would like to preserve your wealth with something that holds real value like precious metals.  And forget about establishing an alternative currency made from silver or gold like Bernard von NotHaus as you may be lumped into a “unique form of terrorism.

How about that; the 1%, who are the majority of individuals whom are hoarding Gold and other precious metals have finally been designated as engaging in a “unique form of terrorism.” Don’t put too much faith in that statement, as it will be the 99% who hold any of these precious metals in reserve that the DHS is actually tracking, not their Corporate Masters or the nation’s Elites.

11.  Owning guns and ammo.  Let’s face it: you disagree with the American government colluding with international banks to rob you blind AND you’ve armed yourself?  This is also why returning veterans have also been labeled potential terrorists — they have guns, know how to use them, and may be angry about the lies that sent them to war.

Americans have the Constitutional right to possess and bear arms. In fascist/authoritarian regimes, rights that were previously protected will and are being dismantled by a Police State that has no regard or respect for the principles that founded this once great nation. Furthermore, to disparage our returning veterans, many of who are maimed and disfigured, is an insult to our military and those who made the decision to “fight for their country.” MUCH MORE

We strongly urge the readership to view the full post at the Activist Post to understand (if you can) this direct assault on the rights of almost every American alive – and what the ramifications could be for this unreasonable and unconstitutional characterization of the American public. We have attempted to de-bunk each and every one of the above absurdities, however, our logic and justification for these allegations will surely fall on the deaf ears of a Congress and Presidency that seem to be declaring war on the American public rather than attempting to fix our economy and solve the issues that are destroying Liberty and Democracy in the United States. That said, we have one of our own “bullet points” to list:

1.  You might be a fascist and approve of tyranny if you’re a Member of Congress or the Obama Administration and believe that any of the above rationale honestly applies to the American public in general.

Print Friendly


  • Freedom

    Today, in the Daily Oklahoman http://newsok.com/article/3733327#comment-724085162 The story indicates the Oklahoma Insurance Department just spent $180K on guns, police vehicles. This caught my eye because there seems to be a pattern across the country of the odd government agencies amassing weapons and or ammunition.

    In this case, the agency nine member anti-fraud unit which primarily investigates white collar crimes made the odd purchase of equipment typically used by police officers and SWAT teams. Seemed an odd purchase by an agency that investigated worker’s comp fraud.

    It turns out they intend to perform “insurance checkpoints” much like a “dui check point” for the stated purpose of making sure the citizens were safe on the road. In Oklahoma you cannot ordinarily simply pull someone over to check to see if they have insurance because of Fourth Amendment issues. I’ll spare you the case law, but you can have randomized “dui checks” if certain criteria is met.

    During that “dui check” police officer’s can of course ask for proof of insurance. Ordinarily, police aren’t allowed in Oklahoma to simply stop you to check your papers. The failure to maintain auto insurance is simply a misdemeanor traffic offense in Oklahoma. As such, it really has no rational relationship to the investigation of fraudulent insurance claims. Yet we now have another state agency setting up “check points” along our highways. This practice is sure to be challenged by those defending the Fourth Amendment in Oklahoma, of which I am one.

    I’m not sure if this practice is happening in other agencies yet, but it’s worth keeping an eye out for. At any rate, the article caused me to look for a previous drone story in the Oklahoman where a poster left a link your blog and this article. http://newsok.com/oklahoma-chosen-as-test-site-for-drones/article/3688386 I enjoyed your article.

    As of August, the Drones have spread to 26 states according to this article below.
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/9/states-skirmish-for-drone-test-sites/

    Thanks for doing your part to keep America free.
    God Bless

  • Rwolf

     

    NEXT: Will U.S. Government Deem 1st Amendment
    Activities—SUPPORT Terrorism, Hostilities, Belligerents?

    Where U.S. Government appears headed with the Patriot Act, The
    National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 and recently introduced “Enemy
    Expatriation Act” that would allow U.S. Government to Strip Americans of
    Citizenship without evidence or a conviction—is getting Congress to grant U.S.
    Government (The Executive Branch) the Power to arbitrarily arrest, charge,
    Indefinitely Detain Americans that participate in 1st Amendment activities (on
    the premise) that 1st Amendment Activities appeared intended or were used to
    support or provoke hostilities, combatants, belligerents; terrorism and or
    threaten National Security. It is foreseeable millions of Americans would
    increasingly not attend political meetings or peaceful protests out of fear
    they might be arrested, lose their job; be put on Homeland Security’s NO Hire
    List, especially if they work for a government agency or contractor—that
    happened in Nazi Germany.

    Soon Americans won’t be able to arrange or attend a
    1st Amendment protected meeting or other activity e.g., a doctor or business
    appointment without government/police knowing about it. U.S. Government is on
    the threshold of having surveillance cameras and drones most everywhere. TSA is
    expanding its checkpoints on highways, bus and train stops and ports. U.S.
    Government is actively monitoring without warrants—journalists, U.S. Citizens’
    social networks, emails, phone calls, Internet Activity and faxes. One can only guess how much
    radiation is transmitted into the bodies of Americans by U.S. Government and Police
    covert scanning (without warrants) private homes—Americans walking on the
    street; driving vehicles; especially repeated scanning of “Persons of
    Interests”—potentially damaging their health. Had the Nazi police
    or Gestapo had X-ray scanners, no doubt the Nazis would have manufactured any
    reason or no reason to repeatedly x-ray at checkpoints, anywhere—persons the
    Reich deemed politically or socially undesirable, until either a targeted
    person was too ill to travel or dead.

    Most Americans haven’t awakened to the fact they are subject to an
    array of recently passed Fascist Laws including The National Defense
    Authorization Act and perhaps soon—the Enemy Expatriation Act that U.S.
    Government can unleash against the public. Congress gave U.S. Government the
    power to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans without probable cause or
    bringing charges:  Detained U.S.
    Citizens now have no right to an attorney or trial or right to learn the
    charges against them—if any. If that isn’t Fascism what is?

    It is foreseeable U.S. activists in the future that occupy government
    and other property (and) violate State or Federal laws will be charged by U.S.
    Government for conspiring or provoking violence; supporting hostilities;
    International and or Domestic Terrorism and may be incarcerated in Indefinite
    Detention or prosecuted under United States Code 18 Sec. 2331 (appear intended
    (i)“to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy
    of a government by intimidation or coercion…” Any
    Violent-Occupation or Protest even if caused by agent provocateurs, potentially
    can play into the hands of individuals, law enforcement and corporations that
    may want America turned into a Police State: Almost any criminal or physical
    act can be used by U.S. Government or Police to charge a person or group with
    advocating, supporting or committing terrorism. Considering these
    laws—only idiots or provocateurs would advocate violence or destruction of
    property.  

    U.S. terrorist laws are broad
    and vague and can be used by Government or Police against anyone, which makes
    it easy to set up or frame anyone for being involved in or connected to
    terrorism—perhaps for no other reason a Citizen or group dared challenge or
    question government policy.

    18 U.S.C. § 2331: US Code – Section
    2331 Definitions of Terrorism

    As used in this chapter –
    (1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that –
    (A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;
    (B) appear to be intended –
    (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
    (ii) to influence the policy of a government by
    intimidation or coercion; or
    (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass
    destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
    (C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of
    the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum;
    (2) the term “national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
    (3) the term “person” means any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
    (4) the term “act of war” means any act occurring in the course
    of –
    (A) declared war;
    (B) armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared,
    between two or more nations; or
    (C) armed conflict between military forces of any origin; and
    (5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that –
    (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
    (B) appear to be intended –
    (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
    (ii) to influence the policy of a government by
    intimidation or coercion; or
    (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass
    destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
    (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of
    the
    United States.

  • Jim

    Having been to both “tea party” and “occupy” protests I find the commentary rediculous(1,2), both were non-violent and mostly addressing the same issues, only differing on which of the false choices of  political parties they support (and dislike) and what the solution is. Did the commenter even watch the Rand Paul clip? (4) Paul CLEARLY STATED these were the beliefs of the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (sic) You obviously know NOTHING about Rand Paul’s (Rons son) philosophy of government (8) As the MIAC report was SECRET until leaked AFTER the election it could hardly be considered election rigging, more likely the source of the slander of Ron Paul supporters (and constitutionalists in general) was the Southern Poverty (sic) Law Center who regularly reports on the “threat” of various shades of constitionalists, militias,”truthers” and other believers in exposing government abuse of power, to law enforcement agencies at every level as dangerous, racist,neo nazi, anti-government, enemies who must be infiltrated and investigated.

  • Pingback: The Government Believes You Might Be A Domestic Terrorist If…. | ThePoliticalBandit.com | Subversion Web 2.0 News()

Subscribe By Email for Updates.
UA-2668157-1
%d bloggers like this: